Hi,
> One problem down, two left! =) bf ==> bq did the trick, thanks. Now at > least if I can't get the DIH solution working I don't have to tack that on > every query string. > I would really recommend to use a boost function. If your rank will change in future implementations, you do not need to redefine the bq. Besides that, I think this is not only more comfortable, but also scales better. The bq-param is more for things like "boost this category" or "boost docs of an advertisement campaign" or something like that. I am not sure, since I never worked with the DIH this way, but - from my logic - the problem could be, that you do not return the row, right? If you don't, try it again when return row was added to your sourcecode. Otherwise, I can't help you, since there are no more codeexamples available at the mailing list (from what I have seen). Maybe this mailing-list topic helps you: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-DIH-s-special-commands-Help-needed-td475695.html#a475695 Using DIHs special commands Help needed . There are some suggestions,... however, it seems like he wasn't able to solve the problem. > And still can't figure out what I need to do with my dismax querying to > get scores for quality of match. > I don't really understand what you mean. Can you explain it a little bit more? What, except the $docBoost, does not work as it should do? Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Document-boosting-troubles-tp902982p904129.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
