Hi Alex, I think you have to explain the complete use case. Paging is done by specifying the parameter "start" (and "rows" if you want to have more or less than 10 hits per page). For each page you need of course a new query, but the queries differ only in the parameter value "start" (first page start=0, second page start=10 etc. if rows=10). The other parameters remain the same.
You should also have a look at facets. They might help you to get a list of the values of your multi valued fields that you can display in the UI, allowing the user to drill down the results further. Chantal On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:26 +0200, "Alex J. G. Burzyński" wrote: > Hi, > > So if those are separate documents how should I handle paging? Two > separate queries? > First to return all matching courses-events pairs, and second one to get > courses for given page? > > Is this common design described in details somewhere? > > Thanks, > Alex > > On 2010-07-09 01:50, Lance Norskog wrote: > > Yes, denormalizing the index into separate (name,town) pairs is the > > common design for this problem. > > > > 2010/7/8 "Alex J. G. Burzyński"<mailing-s...@ajgb.net>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is it possible to remove from search results the multivalued fields that > >> don't pass the search criteria? > >> > >> My schema is defined as: > >> > >> <!-- course_id --> > >> <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" > >> required="true" /> > >> <!-- course_name --> > >> <field name="name" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"/> > >> <!-- events.event_town --> > >> <field name="town" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" > >> multiValued="true"/> > >> <!-- events.event_date --> > >> <field name="date" type="tdate" indexed="true" stored="true" > >> multiValued="true"/> > >> > >> And example docs are: > >> > >> +----+----------------------+------------+------------+ > >> | id | name | town | date | > >> +----+----------------------+------------+------------+ > >> | 1 | Microsoft Excel | London | 2010-08-20 | > >> | | | Glasgow | 2010-08-24 | > >> | | | Leeds | 2010-08-28 | > >> | 2 | Microsoft Word | Aberdeen | 2010-08-21 | > >> | | | Reading | 2010-08-25 | > >> | | | London | 2010-08-29 | > >> | 2 | Microsoft Powerpoint | Birmingham | 2010-08-22 | > >> | | | Leeds | 2010-08-26 | > >> +----+----------------------+------------+------------+ > >> > >> so the query for q=name:Microsoft town:Leeds returns docs 1& 3. > >> > >> How would I remove London/Glasgow from doc 1 and Birmingham from doc 3? > >> > >> Or is it that I should create separate doc for each name-event? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Alex > >> > >> > > > > > >
