It says that the field "sum(1)" is not indexed. You don't have a field
called 'sum(1)'. I know there has been a lot of changes in query
parsing, and sorting by functions may be on the list. But the _val_
trick is the older one and, and you noted, still works. The _val_ trick
sets the ranking value to the output of the function, thus indirectly
doing what sort= does.
Lance
Scott K wrote:
I get the error on all functions.
GET 'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&sort=sum(1)+asc'
Error 400 can not sort on unindexed field: sum(1)
I tried another nightly build from today, Sep 7th, with the same
results. I attached the schema.xml
Thanks for the help!
Scott
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:43, Lance Norskog<goks...@gmail.com> wrote:
Post your schema.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Scott K<s...@skister.com> wrote:
The new spatial filtering (SOLR-1586) works great and is much faster
than fq={!frange. However, I am having problems sorting by distance.
If I try
GET
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*&sort=dist(2,latitude,longitude,0,0)+asc'
I get an error:
Error 400 can not sort on unindexed field: dist(2,latitude,longitude,0,0)
I was able to work around this with
GET 'http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:* AND _val_:"recip(dist(2,
latitude, longitude, 0,0),1,1,1)"&fl=*,score'
But why isn't sorting by functions working? I get this error with any
function I try to sort on.This is a nightly trunk build from Aug 25th.
I see SOLR-1297 was reopened, but that seems to be for edge cases.
Second question: I am using the LatLonType from the Spatial Filtering
wiki, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch
Are there any distance sorting functions that use this field, or do I
need to have three indexed fields, store_lat_lon, latitude, and
longitude, if I want both filtering and sorting by distance.
Thanks, Scott
--
Lance Norskog
goks...@gmail.com
