I hacked SnapPuller to log the cost, and the log is like thus: [2010-11-01 17:21:19][INFO][pool-6-thread-1][SnapPuller.java(1037)]readFully1048576 cost 979 [2010-11-01 17:21:19][INFO][pool-6-thread-1][SnapPuller.java(1037)]readFully1048576 cost 4 [2010-11-01 17:21:19][INFO][pool-6-thread-1][SnapPuller.java(1037)]readFully1048576 cost 4 [2010-11-01 17:21:20][INFO][pool-6-thread-1][SnapPuller.java(1037)]readFully1048576 cost 980 [2010-11-01 17:21:20][INFO][pool-6-thread-1][SnapPuller.java(1037)]readFully1048576 cost 4 [2010-11-01 17:21:20][INFO][pool-6-thread-1][SnapPuller.java(1037)]readFully1048576 cost 5 [2010-11-01 17:21:21][INFO][pool-6-thread-1][SnapPuller.java(1037)]readFully1048576 cost 979
It's saying it cost about 1000ms for transfering 1M data every 2 times. I used jetty as server and embeded solr in my app.I'm so confused.What I have done wrong? At 2010-11-01 10:12:38,"Lance Norskog" <goks...@gmail.com> wrote: >If you are copying from an indexer while you are indexing new content, >this would cause contention for the disk head. Does indexing slow down >during this period? > >Lance > >2010/10/31 Peter Karich <peat...@yahoo.de>: >> we have an identical-sized index and it takes ~5minutes >> >> >>> It takes about one hour to replacate 6G index for solr in my env. But my >>> network can transfer file about 10-20M/s using scp. So solr's http >>> replcation is too slow, it's normal or I do something wrong? >>> >> >> > > > >-- >Lance Norskog >goks...@gmail.com