@Jerry Li What version of Solr were you using? And was there any data in the new field? I have no problems here with a quick test I ran on trunk...
Best Erick On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Jerry Li | 李宗杰 <zongjie...@gmail.com>wrote: > but if I use this field to do sorting, there will be an error occured > and throw an indexOfBoundArray exception. > > On Thursday, November 11, 2010, Robert Petersen <rober...@buy.com> wrote: > > 1) Just put the new field in the schema and stop/start solr. Documents > > in the index will not have the field until you reindex them but it won't > > hurt anything. > > > > 2) Just turn off their handlers in solrconfig is all I think that > > takes. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: gauravshetti [mailto:gaurav.she...@tcs.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:21 AM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Adding new field after data is already indexed > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I had a few questions regarding Solr. > > Say my schema file looks like > > <field name="folder_id" type="long" indexed="true" stored="true"/> > > <field name="indexed" type="boolean" indexed="true" stored="true"/> > > > > and i index data on the basis of these fields. Now, incase i need to add > > a > > new field, is there a way i can add the field without corrupting the > > previous data. Is there any feature which adds a new field with a > > default > > value to the existing records. > > > > > > 2) Is there any security mechanism/authorization check to prevent url > > like > > /admin and /update to only a few users. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Adding-new-field-after-data-is-alread > > y-indexed-tp1862575p1862575.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > > Best Regards. > Jerry. Li | 李宗杰 > >
