I'm shooting in the dark here, but according to this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication>after the slave pulls the index
down, it issues a commit. So if your
slave is configured to generate the dictionary on commit, will it
"just happen"?

But according to this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-866
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-866>this is an open issue....

Best
Erick

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Martin Grotzke <
martin.grot...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Markus Jelsma
> <markus.jel...@openindex.io> wrote:
> > Maybe you've overlooked the build parameter?
> > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.build
> I'm aware of this, but we don't want to maintain cron-jobs on all
> slaves for all spellcheckers for all cores.
> That's why I'm thinking about a more integrated solution. Or did I
> really overlook s.th.?
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
>
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> the spellchecker component already provides a buildOnCommit and
> >> buildOnOptimize option.
> >>
> >> Since we have several spellchecker indices building on each commit is
> >> not really what we want to do.
> >> Building on optimize is not possible as index optimization is done on
> >> the master and the slaves don't even run an optimize but only fetch
> >> the optimized index.
> >>
> >> Therefore I'm thinking about an extension of the spellchecker that
> >> allows you to rebuild the spellchecker based on a cron-expression
> >> (e.g. rebuild each night at 1 am).
> >>
> >> What do you think about this, is there anybody else interested in this?
> >>
> >> Regarding the lifecycle, is there already some executor "framework" or
> >> any regularly running process in place, or would I have to pull up my
> >> own thread? If so, how can I stop my thread when solr/tomcat is
> >> shutdown (I couldn't see any shutdown or destroy method in
> >> SearchComponent)?
> >>
> >> Thanx for your feedback,
> >> cheers,
> >> Martin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grotzke
> http://twitter.com/martin_grotzke
>

Reply via email to