BTW, what is a Delta  (in this context, not an equipment line or a rocket, 
please :-)
Dennis Gearon

Signature Warning
----------------
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a 
better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them 
yourself. from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'

EARTH has a Right To Life,
  otherwise we all die.


--- On Thu, 12/16/10, Li Li <fancye...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Li Li <fancye...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Best practice for Delta every 2 Minutes.
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 10:54 PM
> I think it will not because default
> configuration can only have 2
> newSearcher threads but the delay will be more and more
> long. The
> newer newSearcher will wait these 2 ealier one to finish.
> 
> 2010/12/1 Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu>:
> > If your index warmings take longer than two minutes,
> but you're doing a
> > commit every two minutes -- you're going to run into
> trouble with
> > overlapping index preperations, eventually leading to
> an OOM.  Could this be
> > it?
> >
> > On 11/30/2010 11:36 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't know, you'll have to debug it to see if
> it's the thing that takes
> >> so
> >> long. Solr
> >> should be able to handle 1,200 updates in a very
> short time unless there's
> >> something
> >> else going on, like you're committing after every
> update or something.
> >>
> >> This may help you track down performance with DIH
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#interactive
> >>
> >> <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#interactive>Best
> >> Erick
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:01 AM, stockii<st...@shopgate.com>
>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> how do you think is the deltaQuery better ?
> XD
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>>
> >>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-Delta-every-2-Minutes-tp1992714p1992774.html
> >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >
>

Reply via email to