also try &debugQuery=true and see why each result matched
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:10 PM, mrw <mikerobertsw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Basically, just what you've suggested. I did the field/query analysis piece > with verbose output. Not entirely sure how to interpret the results, of > course. Currently reading anything I can find on that. > > > Thanks > > > Erick Erickson wrote: >> >> What steps have you taken to figure out whether the >> contents of your index are what you think? I suspect >> that the fields you're indexing aren't being >> analyzed/tokenized quite the way you expect either at >> query time or index time (or maybe both!). >> >> Take a look at the admin/analysis page for the field you're indexing >> the data into. If that doesn't shed any light on the problem, >> please paste in the <fieldType> definition for the field in question, >> maybe another set of eyes can see the issue. >> >> Best >> Erick >> >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Different-behavior-for-q-goo-com-vs-q-goo-com-in-queries-tp2168935p2169478.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
