Correct. Given the fact that Solr only requires fields in documents where required="true", how could it? The behavior of "just put everything in a bucket that doesn't have field X" would produce some "interesting" results....
Best Erick On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andy <angelf...@yahoo.com> wrote: > So by default Solr will not return documents that don't contain the > specified group.field? > > > --- On Thu, 1/6/11, Bob Sandiford <bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com> wrote: > > > From: Bob Sandiford <bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com> > > Subject: RE: Will Result Grouping return documents that don't contain the > specified "group.field"? > > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > > Date: Thursday, January 6, 2011, 5:19 PM > > What if you put in a default value > > for the group_id field in the solr schema - would that work > > for you? e.g. something like 'unknown' Then > > you'll get all those with no original group_id value still > > grouped together, and you can figure out at display time > > what you want to do with them. > > > > Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix > > P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com > > www.sirsidynix.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andy [mailto:angelf...@yahoo.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:06 PM > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: Will Result Grouping return documents that > > don't contain the > > > specified "group.field"? > > > > > > I want to group my results by a field named > > "group_id". > > > > > > However, some of my documents don't contain the field > > "group_id". But I > > > still want these documents to be returned as part of > > the results as > > > long as they match the main query "q". > > > > > > Do I need to do anything to tell Solr that I want > > those documents? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
