How about the Solr PHP Client (http://code.google.com/p/solr-php-client/)? We use this and have been quite happy with it, and it seems that it addresses all of the concerns you expressed.
What advantages does yours offer? Liam On 8 March 2011 17:02, Burak <burak...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/07/2011 12:43 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote: > >> Burak, >> >> what's wrong with the existing PHP-Extension >> (http://php.net/manual/en/book.solr.php)? >> > I think "wrong" is not the appropriate word here. But if I had to summarize > why I wrote this API: > > * Not everybody is enthusiastic about adding another item to an already > long list of server dependencies. I just wanted a pure PHP option. > * I am not a C programmer either so the ability to understand the source > code and modify it according to my needs is another advantage. > * Yes, a PECL package would be faster. However, in 99% of the cases, after > everything is said, coded, and byte-code cached, my biggest bottlenecks end > up being the database and network. > * Last of all, choice is what open source means to me. > > Burak > > > > > > > > > -- Liam O'Boyle IntelligenceBank Pty Ltd Level 1, 31 Coventry Street Southbank, Victoria 3006, Australia P: +613 8618 7810 F: +613 8618 7899 M: +61 403 88 66 44 *Awarded 2010 "Best New Business" and "Business of the Year" - Business3000 Awards* This email and any attachments are confidential and may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both messages. We do not accept liability in connection with transmission of information using the internet.
