Thanks, I'll do the procedure on my test env and update the community, if anybody already went through the process, I would lov to here about it
On Friday, April 22, 2011, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Regardless of what anyone here says, you need to try it. > 3.1 should be able to read 1.4.1, yes. > One the format is switched to 3.1, you can't go back and read it with 1.4.1. > This is why you want to upgrade your Slaves first, then your Master (if you > have > them -- I remember we spoke a while back and that wasn't the case back then). > > Otis > ---- > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Ofer Fort <o...@tra.cx> >> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> >> Sent: Fri, April 22, 2011 1:00:05 PM >> Subject: Re: Index upgrade from 1.4.1 to 3.1 and 4.0 >> >> Thanks Otis, but this is not my case. Most of my fields are not stored >> , but I do have the original data in case I need to reindex. >> My question is do I need to? >> If my 1.4.1 can be read by 3.1, I assume 3.1 can continue to write to it? >> In that case, I continue assuming that 4.0 will know how to read only >> the new segments, and if I optimize it, than I will have only one new >> segment, created by 3.1, thus readable by 4.0. >> It makes sense to me, the only question is if my guesses are right:-) >> Thanks. >> >> On Friday, April 22, 2011, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> >>wrote: >> > Hi Ofer, >> > >> > We recently helped a customer go through just such an upgrade (or maybe > even >> > from 1.3.*). We used a tool that read data from one index and indexed it >> > to >>the >> > new index without having to reindex the data from the original sources. > All >> > fields in the source index were obviously stored. :) >> > >> > Otis >> > ---- >> > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch >> > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ---- >> >> From: Ofer Fort <o...@tra.cx> >> >> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> >> >> Sent: Fri, April 22, 2011 10:34:26 AM >> >> Subject: Re: Index upgrade from 1.4.1 to 3.1 and 4.0 >> >> >> >> Nobody? >> >> Am I the only one in need of upgrading an index that was created with >> 1.4.1? >> >> >> >> Thanks for any info >> >> Ofer >> >> >> >> On Friday, April 22, 2011, Ofer Fort <o...@tra.cx> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> >> > While doing some tests, I realized that an index that was created with >> >> > solr 1.4.1 is readable by solr 3.1, but nt readable by solr 4.0. >> >> > If I plan to migrate my index to 4.0, and I prefer not to reindex it >> >> > all, what would be my best course of action? >> >> > Will it be possible to continue to write to the index with 3.1? Will >> >> > that make it readable from 4.0 or only the newly created segments? >> >> > If I optimize it using 3.1, will that make it readable also from 4.0? >> >> > Thanks >> >> > Ofer >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >
