It finds something under "match" but just nothing under "response". I tried
turning on debugQuery=on but I did not see anything that jumped out at me as
a bug or anything. Is there some kind of threshold setting that I can tinker
with to see if that is the problem?

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote:

>
> On Apr 21, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Brian Lamb wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have an mlt search set up on my site with over 2 million records in the
> > index. Normally, my results look like:
> >
> > <response>
> >  <lst name="responseHeader">
> >    <int name="status">0</int>
> >    <int name="QTime">204</int>
> >  </lst>
> >  <result name="match" numFound="41750" start="0">
> >    <doc>
> >      <str name="title">Some result.</str>
> >    </doc>
> >  </result>
> >  <result name="response" numFound="130872" start="0">
> >    <doc>
> >      <str name="title">A similar result</str>
> >    </doc>
> >    ...
> >  </result>
> > </response>
> >
> > And there are 100 results under response. However, in some cases, there
> are
> > no results under "response". Why is this the case and is there anything I
> > can do about it?
>
> Is it because it couldn't find anything?  Or are you thinking there is a
> bug?  You might try adding &debugQuery=true and see what gets parsed, etc.
> and then try running that query.
>
>
> >
> > Here is my mlt configuration:
> >
> > <requestHandler name="/mlt" class="solr.MoreLikeThisHandler">
> >  <lst name="defaults">
> >    <str name="mlt.fl">title,score</str>
> >    <int name="mlt.mindf">1</int>
> >    <int name="rows">100</int>
> >    <str name="fl">*,score</str>
> >   </lst>
> > </requestHandler>
> >
> > And here is the URL I use to get results:
> > http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt/?q=title:Some random title
> >
> > Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>
> Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>
>

Reply via email to