See ..src/test/org/apache/solr/analysis.

But... you'll be changing the grammar, so
I don't know how tests would actually help you. Actually
I'd expect them to break. And you'd have to write some
new ones of your own to exercise your changes to insure
that they do what you want....

Best
Erick

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Dmitry Kan <dmitry....@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, thanks. Do you know if there are tokenizer specific tests to run after
> compilation?
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> wrote:
>
>> Yes, you can change the rules and recompile.
>>
>> Before you recompile, you have to run 'ant jflex' to  generate the java
>> source.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry....@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 9:21 AM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: solr.StandardTokenizerFactory: more info needed
>>
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> This looks very good. Thanks. Do I understand correctly, that I were to
>> change the tokenizer rules, I could go and change e.g. the token class
>> definitions (like <NUM>) in this file and recompile the code?
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Dmitry,
>> >
>> > The underlying Lucene implementation is here:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_9_1/src/java
>> > /org/apache/lucene/analysis/standard/
>> >
>> > StandardTokenizerImpl.jflex is probably where you should start.
>> >
>> > Steve
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry....@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 3:23 AM
>> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: solr.StandardTokenizerFactory: more info needed
>> >
>> > Hi all!
>> >
>> > solr.StandardTokenizerFactory -- is it possible to see the full
>> > description of its behaviour for solr.1.4 somewhere? Wiki
>> > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.Stand
>> > ardTokenizerFactory
>> > is
>> > very short..
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Dmitry Kan
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dmitry Kan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dmitry Kan
>

Reply via email to