Thanks for offering feedback; if nobody commented I was going to send an FYI post to the dev list. Comments below.
On Jul 15, 2011, at 3:39 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : integrating Solr with other applications. What isn't there is a list of > : what web/email/file crawlers exist, data integration pipelines, and there > : are some other odds and ends like distributions/forks of Solr (Lucid & > : Constellio), and Solandra. So I started to put together this page: > : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrEcosystem instead of essentially > : duplicating what's on SolrIntegration I linked to it. I suspect that some > : might feel that all this information should live on SolrIntegration and so I > : should move this. Yes? I really liked the idea of naming this "Solr > : Ecosystem" but I admit that when it comes down to it, it's basically about > : integrating with Solr. > : > : Any thoughts on this from anyone? > > Looks fine to me. > > I think it makes sense to have a distinction between the "ecosystem" of > tools and such that might be of interest to people using Solr (which may > or may not know about solr directly), and tools that exist specificly to > "integrate" Solr with other things. > > I updated both pages to try and clarify their purpose. I noticed your change on IntegratingSolr but not SolrEcosystem, which is still at rev#3. > One thing that would be nice on hte EcoSystem page is to better call out > when/how these things can be used with solr by linking to info about that > rather then just putting a *S* next to them -- if there isn't a document > somewhere on those sites mentioning Solr, then claiming they have some > level of Solr integration is kind of missleading. I agree that adding a link would be helpful. By the way, every place there is an *S* was deliberately placed there by me because I identified the existence of Solr-specific integration. Do you believe I misattributed an *S*? ~ David
