On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:21 AM, <matthew.fow...@thomsonreuters.com> wrote: > Hi Yonik > > So I tested the join using the sample data below and the latest trunk. I > still got the same behaviour. > > HOWEVER! In this case it was nothing to do with the patch or solr version. It > was the tokeniser splitting G1 into G and 1.
Ah, glad you figured it out! > So thank you for a nice patch and your suggestions. > > I do have a couple of questions for you: At what level does the join happen > and what do you expect the performance penalty to be. We might use this > extensively if the performance penalty isn't great. With the current implementation, the performance is proportional to the number of unique terms in the fields being joined. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
