or actually disabling caching as mentioned here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#Cache_Sizing
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Mike Austin <mike.aus...@juggle.com> wrote: > I'm trying to push to get solr used in our environment. I know I could have > responses saying WHY can't you get more RAM etc.., but lets just skip those > and work with this situation. > > Our index is very small with 100k documents and a light load at the > moment. If I wanted to use the smallest possible RAM on the server, how > would I do this and what are the issues? > > I know that caching would be the biggest lose but if solr ran with no to > little caching, the performance would still be ok? I know this is a relative > question.. > This is the only application using java on this machine, would tuning java > to use less cache help anything? > I should set the cache settings low in the config? > Basically, what will having a very low cache hit rate do to search speed > and server performance? I know more is better and it depends on what I'm > comparing it to but if you could just answer in some way saying that it's > not going to cripple the machine or cause 5 second searches? > > It's on a windows server. > > > Thanks, > Mike > > > >
