On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > Sorry David, probably I misunderstood your reply, what do you mean? > > I'm using Lucid Work Enterprise 1.8, and, as I know , it includes geohashes > patch.
Solr 3x, trunk, and I suspect Lucid Works Enterprise 2.0 (doubtful 1.8)) supports this: <fieldtype name="geohash" class="solr.GeoHashField"/> That is not "the patch" -- SOLR-2155, that is the standard built-in geo support in Solr 3x. The SOLR-2155 patch is a superset (i.e. extends) that field, adding more capability. Are you telling me LWE includes SOLR-2155? Can you point to proof of that please? If it did, then you wouldn't be getting that FieldCache error due to multi-value since SOLR-2155 definitely supports multi-value. You may have luck putting my SOLR-2155 compiled plugin jar in LWE 1.8 according to the instructions I provide; I don't know. > I have to index a multivalued location field and I have to make location > queries on it! > So I figured to use the geohash type ... > Any hint about indexing and searching on a multivalued geohash field? > > > 2011/9/29 Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> > >> Hi Alessandro. >> >> I can't think of any good reason anyone would use the geohash field type >> that is a part of Solr today. If you are shocked I would say that, keep in >> mind the work I've done with geohashes is an extension of what's in Solr, >> it's not what's in Solr today. Recently I ported SOLR-2155 to Solr 3x, and >> in a way that does NOT require that you patch Solr. I attached it to the >> issue just now. >> >> ~ David Smiley >> >> On Sep 29, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> I have already read the topics in the mailing list that are regarding >>> spatial search, but I haven't found an answer ... >>> I have to index a multivalued field of type : "geohash" via solrj. >>> Now I build a string with the lat and lon comma separated ( like >>> 54.569468,67.58494 ) and index it in the geohash field. >>> The indexing process seems to work , but when I try a spatial search, >> Solr >>> returns me an exception with fieldcache on multivalued field. >>> >>> I'm using Lucid Work enterprise 1.8 , and , as I know , it should be >>> integrated with this patch ( >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994256#comment-12994256 >>> ). >>> >>> Am I indexing wrong? Am I missing something? >>> The type of my spatial field is geohash ... >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------- >>> Alessandro Benedetti >>> >>> Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com >> >> > > > -- > -------------------------- > > Benedetti Alessandro > Personal Page: http://tigerbolt.altervista.org > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright > In the forests of the night, > What immortal hand or eye > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
