Hi, If you have 4Gb on your server total, try giving about 1Gb to Solr, leaving 3Gb for OS, OS caching and mem-allocation outside the JVM. Also, add 'ulimit -v unlimited' and 'ulimit -s 10240' to /etc/profile to increase virtual memory and stack limit.
And you should also consider upgrading to latest Solr... -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com On 10. okt. 2011, at 21:02, Tod wrote: > On 10/07/2011 6:21 PM, � wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What Solr version? > > Solr Implementation Version: 1.4.1 955763M - mark - 2010-06-17 18:06:42. Its > running on a Suse Linux VM. > >> How often do you do commits, or do you use autocommit? > > I had been doing commits every 100 documents (the entire set is about 35K > docs so its relatively small. Since that wasn't working, and I read that > commits are expensive, I decided to experiment and wait until all documents > were indexed before committing. I haven't been able to successfully index > all the documents yet to try the manual commit because of this problem. > > > >> What kind and size of docs? > > Mostly MS office and PDF's, some straight HTML pages. I can't give a > specific answer to size but nothing alarmingly large - typical 2-5 page > office documents. > > >> Do you feed from a Java program? Where is the read timeout occurring? Can >> you paste in some logs? > > I'd love to but I could never get it to work. I'm using Perl right now > getting rows from an Oracle database and using LWP to perform the calls to > Solr's REST interface. > > >> How much RAM on your server, and how much did you give to the JVM? > > RAM to JVM: > export CATALINA_OPTIONS="-Xms1024m -Xmx3072m" > > Top output on the VM: > cpu(s): 64.1%us, 11.4%sy, 0.0%ni, 24.0%id, 0.2%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st > mem: 3980384k total, 3803300k used, 177084k free, 393924k buffers > swap: 4194296k total, 512k used, 4193784k free, 1518156k cached > > pid user pr ni virt res shr s %cpu %mem time+ command > 16243 solr 19 0 642m 322m 6256 s 119 8.3 73:16.49 java > > > Thanks.
