Hi,
a number of relevant questions is given.
i have another one:
which type of docs do you have? Do you add some new docs every day? Or is it
a stable number of docs (500Mio.) ?
What about Replication?

Regards Vadim


2011/10/17 Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>

> Hi Jesús,
>
> Others have already asked a number of relevant question.  If I had to
> guess, I'd guess this is simply a disk IO issue, but of course there may be
> room for improvement without getting more RAM or SSDs, so tell us more about
> your queries, about disk IO you are seeing, etc.
>
> Otis
> ----
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
> >________________________________
> >From: Jesús Martín García <jmar...@cesca.cat>
> >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 6:19 AM
> >Subject: millions of records problem
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've got 500 millions of documents in solr everyone with the same number
> of fields an similar width. The version of solr which I used is 1.4.1 with
> lucene 2.9.3.
> >
> >I don't have the option to use shards so the whole index has to be in a
> machine...
> >
> >The size of the index is about 50Gb and the ram is 8Gb....Everything is
> working but the searches are so slowly, although I tried different
> configurations of the solrconfig.xml as:
> >
> >- configure a first searcher with the most used searches
> >- configure the caches (query, filter and document) with great numbers...
> >
> >but everything is still working slowly, so do you have any ideas to boost
> the searches without the penalty to use much more ram?
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >
> >Jesús
> >
> >-- .......................................................................
> >      __
> >    /   /       Jesús Martín García
> >C E / S / C A   Tècnic de Projectes
> >  /__ /         Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya
> >
> >Gran Capità, 2-4 (Edifici Nexus) · 08034 Barcelona
> >T. 93 551 6213 · F. 93 205 6979 · jmar...@cesca.cat
> >.......................................................................
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to