Steven: Not sure why you had problems, #downloads ( http://solr-ra.tgels.org/#downloads ) should point you to the downloads section showing the different versions available for download ? Please share if this is not so ( there were downloads yesterday with no problems )
Regarding NRT, you can switch between RA and Lucene at query level or at config level; in the current version with RA, NRT is in effect while with lucene, it is not, you can get more information from here: http://solr-ra.tgels.org/papers/Solr34_with_RankingAlgorithm13.pdf Solr 3.5 with RankingAlgorithm 1.3 should be available next week. Regards, - Nagendra Nagarajayya http://solr-ra.tgels.org http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org On 12/9/2011 4:49 PM, Steven Ou wrote: > Hey Nagendra, > > I took a look and Solr-RA looks promising - but: > > - I could not figure out how to download it. It seems like all the > download links just point to "#" > - I wasn't looking for another ranking algorithm, so would it be > possible for me to use NRT but *not* RA (i.e. just use the normal Lucene > library)? > > -- > Steven Ou | 歐偉凡 > > *ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer > steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880 > > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Nagendra Nagarajayya < > nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com> wrote: > >> Steven: >> >> Please take a look at Solr with RankingAlgorithm. It offers NRT >> functionality. You can set your autoCommit to about 15 mins. You can get >> more information from here: >> http://solr-ra.tgels.com/wiki/**en/Near_Real_Time_Search_ver_**3.x<http://solr-ra.tgels.com/wiki/en/Near_Real_Time_Search_ver_3.x> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> - Nagendra Nagarajayya >> http://solr-ra.tgels.org >> http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.**org <http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org> >> >> >> On 12/8/2011 9:30 PM, Steven Ou wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'm looking for NRT functionality or similar in Solr 3.5. Is that >>> possible? >>>> From what I understand there's NRT in Solr 4, but I can't figure out >>> whether or not 3.5 can do it as well? >>> >>> If not, is it feasible to use an autoCommit every 1000ms? We don't >>> currently process *that* much data so I wonder if it's OK to just commit >>> >>> very often? Obviously not scalable on a large scale, but it is feasible >>> for >>> a relatively small amount of data? >>> >>> I recently upgraded from Solr 1.4 to 3.5. I had a hard time getting >>> everything working smoothly and the process ended up taking my site down >>> for a couple hours. I am very hesitant to upgrade to Solr 4 if it's not >>> necessary to get some sort of NRT functionality. >>> >>> Can anyone help me? Thanks! >>> -- >>> Steven Ou | 歐偉凡 >>> >>> *ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer >>> steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880 >>> >>>
