It is true number of terms may be much more than N/10 (or even N for
each core), but it is the number of docs per term that will really
matter.  So you can have N terms in each core but each term has 1/10
number of docs on avg.




2011/12/15 Yury Kats <yuryk...@yahoo.com>:
> On 12/15/2011 1:07 PM, Robert Stewart wrote:
>
>> I think overall memory usage would be close to the same.
>
> Is this really so? I suspect that the consumed memory is in direct
> proportion to the number of terms in the index. I also suspect that
> if I divided 1 core with N terms into 10 smaller cores, each smaller
> core would have much more than N/10 terms. Let's say I'm indexing
> English texts, it's likely that all smaller cores would have almost
> the same number of terms, close to the original N. Not so?

Reply via email to