project2501 wrote > > I see what you are asking. This is an interesting question. It seems > inefficient for Solr to apply the > requested rows to all shards only to discard most of the results on merge. > That would consume lots of resources not used in the final result set. > Yeah, like Erick says this is extra working. Maybe, when I asked to get 10 rows from my shards it is insensibly (10x30 or 10x4), but when I asked 2000 we have a big trouble. Finally, we have a lot of needless data.
Michael Ryan wrote > > I had a similar requirement in my project, where a user might ask for up > to 3000 results. What I did was change SolrIndexSearcher.doc(int, Set) to > retrieve the unique key from the field cache instead of retrieving it as a > stored field from disk. This resulted in a massive speed improvement for > these requests (like 10x if I recall correctly). > > -Michael > Thanks Michel, I'll try it. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Poor-performance-on-distributed-search-tp3590028p3599752.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
