Thanks Erick. Regards Sujatha
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > You can have a large number of cores, some people have multiple > hundreds. Having multiple cores is preferred over having > multiple JVMs since it's more efficient at sharing system > resources. If you're running a 32 bit JVM, you are limited in > the amount of memory you can let the JVM use, so that's a > consideration, but otherwise use multiple cores in one JVM > and give that JVM say, half of the physical memory on the > machine and tune from there. > > Best > Erick > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sujatha Arun <suja.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We have in production a number of individual solr Instnaces on a single > > JVM.As a result ,we see that the permgenSpace keeps increasing with each > > additional instance added. > > > > I would Like to know ,if we can have solr cores , instead of individual > > instances. > > > > > > - Is there any limit to the number of cores ,for a single instance? > > - Will this decrease the permgen space as the LIB is shared.? > > - Would there be any decrease in performance with number of cores > added? > > - Any thing else that I should know before moving into cores? > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated? > > > > Regards > > Sujatha >
