We are planning to import data from various tables of ERP DB into a single Solr/Lucene index. Since these tables have overlapping columns we are planing to name the corresponding document field as <table_name>_<column_name>. I have following questions on this.
1) Does having long field name (<table_name>_<column_name>) affect performance ? 2) We will end up with close to 200 fields per document in schema definition. At time of document storage only 20 field per will be indexed and stored for each stored document. Is there a limitation here, are we creating performance bottleneck by designing schema this way ? Thanks Vijay -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Document-with-longer-field-names-and-many-fields-tp3703077p3703077.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
