Ok, thanks, Erick, good to know. Sorry for the confusion. On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, don't do that. That's definitely not good advice. If the analysis > chain is the same for both index and query, just use <analyzer>. > > As for Marian's issue... was there literally a + in the query or was that > urlencoded? Try debugQuery=true for both queries and see what you get for > the query parsing output. > > Erik > > On Feb 3, 2012, at 14:18 , Dmitry Kan wrote: > > > Actually, I wouldn't count on it and just specify index and query sides > > explicitly. Just to play it safe. > > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Marian Steinbach <mar...@sendung.de> > wrote: > > > >> 2012/2/3 Dmitry Kan <dmitry....@gmail.com>: > >>> What about <query> side of the field? > >>> > >> > >> It's identical. At least that's what I think, since I din't specify > >> the type="query" or type="index" attribute for the analyzer part. > >> > >> Marian > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Dmitry Kan > > -- Regards, Dmitry Kan
