Yes, that (TextField, StrField) looks like ancient Lucene stuff from the previous decade :)
Otis ---- Performance Monitoring SaaS for Solr - http://sematext.com/spm/solr-performance-monitoring/index.html ----- Original Message ----- > From: Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:28 PM > Subject: Re: What versions support compressed text fields? > > So this statement is false? > > "Field types that store text (TextField, StrField) support compression of > stored contents" > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml > > And the attributes compressed and compressThreshold are no longer supported? > > wunder > > On Feb 13, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > >> Hi Wunder, >> >> Unless I missed something, you simply need to do compressing/uncompressing > on your own - old Solr/Lucene versions would do that for you, but that's > ancient history. >> >> Otis >> ---- >> Performance Monitoring SaaS for Solr - > http://sematext.com/spm/solr-performance-monitoring/index.html >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 5:51 PM >>> Subject: What versions support compressed text fields? >>> >>> I've looked at the wiki and the changelog, and I'm still > confused about >>> what versions support compressed fields. >>> >>> We have an index which is rapidly growing through 100Gb, and I'd > like to >>> turn on text field compression without reindexing. Is that possible? >>> >>> We are on 3.3.0. >>> >>> wunder >>> -- >>> Walter Underwood >>> wun...@wunderwood.org >>> Search Guy, Chegg.com >>> > > -- > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org >
