Robert - Did you mean for me to attach my docs to an existing ticket (which one?) or just want to make sure I attach the docs to the new issue?
- Naomi On Feb 23, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Robert Muir [via Lucene] wrote: > Please attach your docs if you dont mind. > > I worked up tests for this (in general for ANY phrase query, > increasing the slop should never remove results, only potentially > enlarge them). > > It fails already... but its good to also have your test case too... > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Naomi Dushay <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Robert, > > > > I will create a jira issue with the documentation. FYI, I tried ps values > > of 3, 2, 1 and 0 and none of them worked with dismax; For lucene > > QueryParser, only the value of 0 got results. > > > > - Naomi > > > > > > On Feb 23, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir [via Lucene] wrote: > > > >> Is it possible to also provide your document? > >> If you could attach the document and the analysis config and queries > >> to a JIRA issue, that would be most ideal. > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Naomi Dushay <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> > >> > Robert, > >> > > >> > You found it! it is the phrase slop. What do I do now? I am using > >> > Solr from trunk from December, and all those JIRA tixes are marked fixed > >> > … > >> > > >> > - Naomi > >> > > >> > > >> > Solr 1.4: > >> > > >> > luceneQueryParser: > >> > > >> > URL: q=all_search:"The Beatles as musicians : Revolver through the > >> > Anthology"~3 > >> > final query: all_search:"the beatl as musician revolv through the > >> > antholog"~3 > >> > > >> > got result > >> > > >> > > >> > Solr 3.5 > >> > > >> > luceneQueryParser: > >> > > >> > URL: q=all_search:"The Beatles as musicians : Revolver through the > >> > Anthology"~3 > >> > final query: all_search:"the beatl as musician revolv through the > >> > antholog"~3 > >> > > >> > NO result > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> lucene QueryParser: > >> >> > >> >> URL: q=all_search:"The Beatles as musicians : Revolver through the > >> >> Anthology" > >> >> final query: all_search:"the beatl as musician revolv through the > >> >> antholog" > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Feb 22, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Robert Muir [via Lucene] wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Naomi Dushay <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> > Jonathan has brought it to my attention that BOTH of my failing > >> >> > searches happen to have 8 terms, and one of the terms is repeated: > >> >> > > >> >> > "The Beatles as musicians : Revolver through the Anthology" > >> >> > "Color-blindness [print/digital]; its dangers and its detection" > >> >> > > >> >> > but this is a PHRASE search. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Can you take your same phrase queries, and simply add some slop to > >> >> them (e.g. ~3) and ensure they still match with the lucene > >> >> queryparser? SloppyPhraseQuery has a bit of a history with repeats > >> >> since Lucene 2.9 that you were using. > >> >> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3068 > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3215 > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3412 > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> lucidimagination.com > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > >> >> discussion below: > >> >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/result-present-in-Solr-1-4-but-missing-in-Solr-3-5-dismax-only-tp3767851p3768619.html > >> >> To unsubscribe from result present in Solr 1.4, but missing in Solr > >> >> 3.5, dismax only, click here. > >> >> NAML > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > View this message in context: > >> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/result-present-in-Solr-1-4-but-missing-in-Solr-3-5-dismax-only-tp3767851p3770665.html > >> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> lucidimagination.com > >> > >> > >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > >> below: > >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/result-present-in-Solr-1-4-but-missing-in-Solr-3-5-dismax-only-tp3767851p3770681.html > >> To unsubscribe from result present in Solr 1.4, but missing in Solr 3.5, > >> dismax only, click here. > >> NAML > > > > > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/result-present-in-Solr-1-4-but-missing-in-Solr-3-5-dismax-only-tp3767851p3770746.html > To unsubscribe from result present in Solr 1.4, but missing in Solr 3.5, > dismax only, click here. > NAML
