Join looks interesting for this as well, is this currently supported in SolrCloud?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > What would you recommend instead, I had thought about block join perhaps I'm > open to suggestions tbough > > > On Wednesday, March 21, 2012, Martijn v Groningen > <martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure if grouping is the right feature to use for your >> requirements... Grouping does have an impact on performance which you need >> to take into account. >> Depending on what grouping features you're going to use (grouped facets, >> ngroups), grouping performs well on large indices if you use filters >> queries well. >> (E.g. 100M travel offers, but during searching only interrested in in >> travel offers to specific destinations or in a specific period of time). >> Best way to find this out, is to just try it out. >> >> On 21 March 2012 22:34, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I was wondering how much more intensive grouping queries are in >>> general. I am considering using grouping queries as my primary query >>> because I have the need to store a document as pieces with varying >>> access controls, for instance a portion of a document a user can see >>> but an admin can see the entire thing (I'm greatly simplifying this). >>> My thought was to do a grouping request and group on a field which >>> contained a key which the documents all shared, but I am worried about >>> how well this will perform at scale. Any thoughts/suggestions on this >>> would be appreciated. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Met vriendelijke groet, >> >> Martijn van Groningen >>
