I've filed an issue for myself as a reminder. Guava r05 is pretty old
indeed, time to upgrade.

S.

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 23:12, Nicholas Ball <nicholas.b...@nodelay.com>wrote:

>
> Hey Staszek,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Yep using 4.x and that was exactly what I ended up
> doing, a quick replace :)
> Just thought I'd document it somewhere for a proper fix to be done in the
> 4.0 release.
>
> No issues arose for me but then again Erick mentions it's only used in
> Carrot2 contrib which I'm not using in my deployment.
>
> Thanks for the help!
> Nick
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:40:14 +0200, Stanislaw Osinski
> <stanis...@osinski.name> wrote:
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > Which version of Solr do you have in mind? The official 3.x line or 4.0?
> >
> > The quick and dirty fix to try would be to just replace Guava r05 with
> the
> > latest version, chances are it will work (we did that in the past though
> > the version number difference was smaller).
> >
> > The proper fix would be for us to make a point release of Carrot2 with
> > dependencies updated and update Carrot2 in Solr. And this brings us to
> the
> > question about the version of Solr you use. Upgrading Carrot2 in 4.0
> > shouldn't be an issue, but when it comes to 3.x I'd need to check.
> >
> > Staszek
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 13:10, Erick Erickson
> > <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hmmm, near as I can tell, guava is only used in the Carrot2 contrib, so
> >> maybe
> >> ask over at: http://project.carrot2.org/?
> >>
> >> Best
> >> Erick
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Nicholas Ball
> >> <nicholas.b...@nodelay.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hey all,
> >> >
> >> > Working on a plugin, which uses the Curator library (ZooKeeper
> client).
> >> > Curator depends on the very latest Google Guava library which
> >> unfortunately
> >> > clashes with Solr's outdated r05 of Guava.
> >> > Think it's safe to say that Solr should be using the very latest
> Guava
> >> > library (11.0.1) too right?
> >> > Shall I open up a JIRA issue for someone to update it?
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Nick
> >>
>

Reply via email to