This is really difficult to answer because there are so many variables; the number of unique terms, whether you store fields or not (which is really unrelated to memory consumption during searching), etc, etc, etc. So even trying the index and just looking at the index directory won't tell you much about memory consumption.
And memory use has been dramatically improved in the 4.x code line, so anything we can say is actually wrong. Not to mention that your particular use of caches (filterCache, queryResultCache etc) will change during runtime. I'm afraid you'll just have to try it and see. Yes, LIA is accurate... Best Erick On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Sachin Aggarwal <different.sac...@gmail.com> wrote: > hello, > > need help regarding how solr stores the indexes i was reading a article > that says solr also stores the indexes in same format as explained in > appendix B of lucene in action is it true > > and what parameters do i need to focus on while estimating the memory used > by my use case > > as i have table like (userid, username, usertime, userlocation, userphn, > timestamp, address) > what i believe in my case cardinality of some fields like gender and > location userphnmodel will be very less will that influence > > any links to read further will b appreciated. > > -- > > Thanks & Regards > > Sachin Aggarwal > 7760502772
