Would all optional fields need the sortmissinglast and sortmissingfirst set even when not sorting on that field? Seems broken to me.
Sent from my Mobile device 720-256-8076 On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:45 AM, Shubham Srivastava <shubham.srivast...@makemytrip.com> wrote: > Just adding to the below--> If there is a field(say X) which is not populated > and in the query I am not sorting on this particular field but on another > field (say Y) still the result ordering would depend on X . > > Infact in the below problem mentioned by Harsh making X as > sortMissingLast="false" sortMissingFirst="false" solved the problem while in > the query he was sorting on Y. This seems a bit illogical. > > Regards, > Shubham > ________________________________________ > From: Harshvardhan Ojha [harshvardhan.o...@makemytrip.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 5:58 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Problem with sorting solr docs > > Hi, > > I have added <field name="latlng" indexed="true" stored="true" > sortMissingLast="false" sortMissingFirst="false"/> to my schema.xml, although > I am searching on name field. > It seems to be working fine. What is its default behavior? > > Regards > Harshvardhan Ojha > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rafał Kuć [mailto:r....@solr.pl] > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 5:35 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Problem with sorting solr docs > > Hello! > > But the latlng field is not taken into account when sorting with sort defined > such as in your query. You only sort on the name field and only that field. > You can also define Solr behavior when there is no value in the field, but > adding sortMissingLast="true" or sortMissingFirst="true" to your type > definition in the schema.xml file. > > -- > Regards, > Rafał Kuć > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch > >> Hi, > >> Thanks for reply. >> I want to sort my docs on name field, it is working well only if I have all >> fields populated well. >> But my latlng field is optional, every doc will not have this value. >> So those docs are not getting sorted. > >> Regards >> Harshvardhan Ojha > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rafał Kuć [mailto:r....@solr.pl] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 5:24 PM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Problem with sorting solr docs > >> Hello! > >> Your query suggests that you are sorting on the 'name' field instead >> of the latlng field (sort=name +asc). > >> The question is what you are trying to achieve ? Do you want to sort >> your documents from a given geographical point ? If that's the case >> you may want to look here: >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch/ >> and look at the possibility of sorting on the distance from a given point. > >> -- >> Regards, >> Rafał Kuć >> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - >> ElasticSearch > > >> Hi, >> >> I have 260 docs which I want to sort on a single field latlng. >> <doc> >> <str name="id">1</str> >> <str name="name">Amphoe Khanom</str> >> <str name="latlng">1.0,1.0</str> >> </doc> >> >> My query is : >> http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=*:*&sort=name +asc >> >> This query sorts all documents except those which doesn’t have latlng, >> and I can’t keep any default value for this field. >> My question is how can I sort all docs on latlng? >> >> Regards >> Harshvardhan Ojha | Software Developer - Technology Development >> | MakeMyTrip.com, 243 SP Infocity, Udyog Vihar Phase 1, Gurgaon, >> Haryana - 122 016, India > >> What's new?: Inspire - Discover an inspiring new way to plan and book travel >> online. > > >> Office Map > >> Facebook > >> Twitter > > >> >
