I'd try several things.... 1> just because you an sort has nothing to do with whether the field is returned. Sorting uses the indexed data, returning it is the stored data. So it's a bit of a red herring when you can sort on a field but not see it, although it is a good test that your schema knows about the field.
2> Try fl=* just for yucks. 3> Check your schema.xml for typos. stroed="true" for instance? 4> Why are you restricting your returns to 1 and only one document? Are you absolutely sure that that document has the new field? Solr happily sorts documents that do not have a value for a field, that's the purpose of sortMissingFirst/Last. FWIW Erick On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Dotan Cohen <dotanco...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Otis Gospodnetic > <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > That should work just fine. It;s either a bug or you are doing something > > you didn't mention. Maybe you can provide a small, self-enclosed unit > test > > and stick it in JIRA? > > > > I would assume that it's me doing something wrong! How does this look: > > > /solr/select?q=*&rows=1&sort=created_iso8601%20desc&fl=created_iso8601,created > > <response> > <lst name="responseHeader"> > <int name="status">0</int> > <int name="QTime">1</int> > <lst name="params"> > <str name="q">*:*</str> > <str name="rows">1</str> > <str name="fl">created_iso8601,created</str> > </lst> > </lst> > <result name="response" numFound="1037937" start="0"> > <doc> > <int name="created">1350854389</int> > </doc> > </result> > </response> > > Surely the sort parameter would throw an error if the > created_iso8601field did not exist. That field is indexed and stored, > with no parameters defined on handlers that may list the fields to > return as Alexandre had mentioned. > > > -- > Dotan Cohen > > http://gibberish.co.il > http://what-is-what.com >
