Steve, It seems to me your task has a lot in common with mines. I tell about several approaches at next week http://www.apachecon.eu/schedule/presentation/18/ .
Thanks On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 6:43 AM, SR <r.steve....@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Otis. > By "we" you mean "Lucid works"? > > Is there a chance to get it sometime soon in the open source? > > Thanks, > -S > > On 2012-11-03, at 10:39 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > It doesn't exist in solr. We've built it for clients. Elasticsearch has > it > > built in. > > > > Otis > > -- > > Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm > > On Nov 3, 2012 10:37 PM, "SR" <r.steve....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Thanks Ahmet that's exactly what I need. Do you now whether this feature > >> exists in Solr? Or do I have to go through Lucene directly? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -SR > >> > >> On 2012-11-03, at 10:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Steve, > >>> > >>> I would store my documents as queries in your case. You may find these > >> relevant. > >>> > >>> > >> > http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-BETA/memory/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/MemoryIndex.html > >>> > >>> http://www.elasticsearch.org/blog/2011/02/08/percolator.html > >>> > >>> > >>> --- On Sun, 11/4/12, SR <r.steve....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> From: SR <r.steve....@gmail.com> > >>>> Subject: Re: All document keywords must match the query keywords > >>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >>>> Date: Sunday, November 4, 2012, 4:16 AM > >>>> Thanks Jack. > >>>> > >>>> This is not the ultimate goal of my search system; it's only > >>>> one of the features I need. I don't need "best" and > >>>> "restaurant" to match in this feature. > >>>> > >>>> Yes, I do have the semantic of query backwards, and that's > >>>> what I need in my application. > >>>> > >>>> -S > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 2012-11-03, at 10:05 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> But neither "best" nor "restaurant" are in any of the > >>>> documents, so how are any of these documents reasonable > >>>> matches? > >>>>> > >>>>> You have the semantics of query backwards. The > >>>> documents are the "data" and the query is the "operation" to > >>>> be performed on the data. The intent of a query is to > >>>> specify what documents should be selected. That is the > >>>> function/purpose of any query, in any search system. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Jack Krupansky > >>>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- From: SR > >>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 5:09 PM > >>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >>>>> Subject: Re: All document keywords must match the query > >>>> keywords > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 2012-11-03, at 12:55 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 3 November 2012 22:17, SR <r.steve....@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Solr 4.0 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I need to return documents when all their > >>>> keywords are matching the query. > >>>>>>> In other words, all the document keywords > >>>> should match the query keywords > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> e.g., query: best chinese food restaurant > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> doc1: chinese food > >>>>>>> doc2: italian food > >>>>>>> doc3: chinese store > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Only doc1 should be returned ("chinese food" is > >>>> matching the query). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any idea on how this can be achieved? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Not sure what you mean by all the keywords should > >>>> match, given your > >>>>>> examples above. doc2 will match because of "food" > >>>> and doc3 will match > >>>>>> because of "chinese". > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you really want all search terms to be matched, > >>>> you can change the > >>>>>> default operator for solrQueryParser in schema.xml > >>>> from OR to AND, > >>>>>> but in your example even doc1 will not match as you > >>>> are searching > >>>>>> for "best chinese food restaurant". If you searched > >>>> for "chinese food" > >>>>>> it would match. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Gora > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Gora, > >>>>> > >>>>> I really meant that. doc 2 shouldn't match because > >>>> "italian" is not in the query. Same thing for doc3 with > >>>> "store". It's like applying an AND but on the document > >>>> keywords, instead of the query keywords. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> -S= > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Tech Lead Grid Dynamics <http://www.griddynamics.com> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
