I wouldn't use a random code - follow the pattern of increments. - Mark
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, Mark. > > I didn´t know if adding that constant (with a random hexadecimal selected > by me) could affect to other parts of code. In fact some day it existed and > currently not, so it may be a reason why that occurred. Also, copy & > pasting a patch that you don´t really understand what´s doing and setting a > new constant to Solr code sounds a little bit, errr... unsafe, :-P > > I´ll try tomorrow. > > Regards, > > - Luis Cappa. > > > 2012/11/27 Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> > >> Add it? >> >> - Mark >> >> On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I´ve recently patched Solr 4.0 tag but it exists a conflict >> > with PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS final static attributed in >> ShardRequest.java. >> > The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > >> > - Luis Cappa. >> > >> > >> > 2012/11/27 Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> Hello, guys. >> >> >> >> Does anyone tested the latest SOLR-788< >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788> MLT >> >> patch with Solr 4.0? It´s a very important Sorl feature that I would >> like >> >> to have in a SolrCloud environment. I use Eclipse as IDE, and I´m >> >> familiarized with Maven so it looks like I´ll spend one or two days >> >> configuring a dev environment to apply the patch and compile de code >> with >> >> Ant, Ivy, etc.. Before doing that 'effort' I would like to know if >> everyone >> >> applied this patch before and if the result was good. >> >> >> >> Thank you very much! >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> - Luis Cappa >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > - Luis Cappa >> >> > > > -- > > - Luis Cappa -- - Mark
