Would you still have performance impact if you set to no cache and just use fq to avoid impact on rating ? On Dec 11, 2012 7:00 PM, "Mikhail Khludnev" <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> It's worth to mention that fq is profitable only if you have high hit ratio > and proper filterCache size. If you see low hit ratio you just waste > resources on it. > 11.12.2012 8:24 пользователь "Otis Gospodnetic" < > otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> > написал: > > > If you don't need scoring on it then yes, just use fq. > > > > Otis > > -- > > SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Floyd Wu <floyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Otis. > > > > > > When talked about query performance(ignore scoring). To use fq is > better? > > > > > > Floyd > > > > > > > > > 2012/12/11 Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The fq one is a FilterQuery that only does matching, but not scoring. > > > It's > > > > results are stored in the filter cache, while the q uses the query > > cache. > > > > > > > > Otis > > > > -- > > > > SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Floyd Wu <floyd...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi There, > > > > > Sorry for sapmming if this question had already asked. > > > > > > > > > > Wha't the main difference between > > > > > > > > > > q=fieldA:value AND fieldB:value > > > > > > > > > > q=fieldA:value&fq=fieldB:value > > > > > > > > > > both query will give me the same result, I wonder what's the main > > > > > difference and in practice what the better way? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > > > > > Floyd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
