Dynamic fields resulted in poor response times? How many fields did each document have? I can't see how a dynamic field should have any difference from any other field in terms of response time.
Or are you querying across a large number of dynamic fields concurrently? I can imagine that slowing things down. Upayavira On Mon, Jan 7, 2013, at 05:18 PM, Uwe Reh wrote: > Hi Robi, > > thank you for the contribution. It's exiting to read, that your index > isn't contaminated by the number of fields. I can't exclude other > mistakes, but my first experience with extensive use of dynamic fields > have been very poor response times. > > Even though I found an other solution, I should give the straight > forward solution a second chance. > > Uwe > > Am 07.01.2013 17:40, schrieb Petersen, Robert: > > Hi Uwe, > > > > We have hundreds of dynamic fields but since most of our docs only use some > > of them it doesn't seem to be a performance drag. They can be viewed as a > > sparse matrix of fields in your indexed docs. Then if you make the > > sortinfo_for_groupx an int then that could be used in a function query to > > perform your sorting. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery >
