Rakudten wrote > Hello again! > > Uhm, so if I have understood then if I´m writing/reading from the index at > the same time (in other words, indexing operations are executing at the > same that that other ones are querying) the performance goes down, isn´t > it?
Committing is the problem (soft or hard) due to the subsequent warmup of the point cache, not adding/indexing data. Rakudten wrote > Refering to the fieldType that I´m using, I´m just testing and I just want > to implement the classic scenario where each document has one coordinate > and to which execute geo spatial queries "given a circle with X radius". I > was testing with a multiValued field because I was wondering to include > one > or more coordinates for each document due to the requirements of the > project that I´m developing: I´m tracking users positions until a top of N > positions (coordinates) to be stored in that multiValued field, but I can > adapt into just one coordinate per user if that change gets a better > performance. > > In other words, David, and to summary: > > - I just one to implement the classic scenario "coordinate + circle + > radius X". > > - Due to NRT user position changes, I will write & read into the index > continuosly. > > - I was testing with that fieldType multiValued, but I can change it into > another fieldType and into a single value field type if that improves > performance. In that case, what would you recommend? Is it good enough sort by the most recent point only? You could still filter by all points if you want. Spatial sorting & filtering are currently independent. So I suggest using not only the fieldType you have there but also LatLonType for the latest position that you want to sort on. Configure it (via coordinate_ field type) to use floats instead of doubles. Rakudten wrote > - If even changing fieldTypes, multiValues or not, etc. the performance > doesn´t improves, what other alternatives would you recommend me to use? > I´m a Solr lover from Solr 1.4 version, but I´m familiar to other Spatial > Search alternatives technologies/tools/dbs like MongoDB. Any suggestions > or > recommendations? Solr should be fine. Cheers, David ----- Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-1-problems-with-Spatial-Search-tp4044868p4046004.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
