I thought git patch format was different from svn's. Would that cause issues?
Regard, Alex On 21 Mar 2013 05:53, "Jan Høydahl" <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute > > Whether you choose to work locally with a GIT checkout or SVN is up to > you. At the end of the day, when you want to contribute stuff back, you'd > generate a patch and attach it to JIRA. SVN is the main repo, so if you > want to be 100% in sync, choose the official SVN. > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com > > 21. mars 2013 kl. 10:31 skrev Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com>: > > > I want to branch Solr (latest version) at my local and implement some > > custom codes. After some time(maybe every month) I will merge my code > with > > Solr. However There is code at SVN and Github for Solr and I see that > they > > are not exactly synchronous. Which one do you suggest, do you think that > if > > there is no time delay between SVN and Github repositories using Git is > > much better cos of merging easiness? > >