It is logical to use facet pagination for us, if it would work. It just doesn't, probably due the data amount we store and imposed RAM settings.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Toke Eskildsen <t...@statsbiblioteket.dk>wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 18:22 +0200, Dmitry Kan wrote: > > Does it even make sense to paginate in facet searches, if we require deep > > paging? > > Whether it makes sense logically is up to you. > > Technically deep paging in facets could be implemented in approximately > the same way as deep paging in search results: By providing previously > received maximum count and value, the faceting module could skip ahead > to the subsequent entries and only return those. > > It would be fairly simple to implement for single core, but tricky for > distributed search. I am not aware of any initiatives in that direction. > > - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library > >
