Well, returning the content field for highlighting is within my requirements. Did you solve this in some other way? or you just didn't have to?
Bai Shen wrote > The only issue I ran into was returning the content field. Once I > modified > my query to avoid that, I got good performance. > > Admittedly, I only have about 15-20k documents in my index ATM, but most > of > them are in the multiMB range with a current max of 250MB. > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:05 AM, adfel70 < > adfel70@ > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> In previous versions of solr, indexing documents with large fields caused >> performance degradation. >> >> Is this still the case in solr 4.2? >> >> If so, and I'll need to chunk the document and index many document parts, >> can anyony give a general idea of what field/document size solr CAN >> handle? >> >> thanks. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-indexing-large-documents-still-an-issue-tp4060425.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-indexing-large-documents-still-an-issue-tp4060425p4060431.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
