Hi, Can you actually make this happen?
Otis Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On May 2, 2013 8:12 AM, "Furkan KAMACI" <furkankam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the answer. This is what I try to say: > > time = t > Node A (Leader): version is 100 > Node B (Replica): version is 90 > > time = t+1 > Node A (Killing): version is 100 and killed > Node B (Replica): version is 90 > > time = t+2 > Node A (Killed): version is 100 and killed > Node B (Become Leader): version is 95 (we indexed something) > > time = t+3 > Node A (Started as Replica): version is 100 and live > Node B (Leader): version is 95 > > so I think that leader will behind replica. Is there anything different for > such scenario? > > > > 2013/5/2 Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> > > > The leader would not be behind replica because the old leader would not > > come back and take over the leader role. It would ne just a replica and > it > > would replicate the index from whichever node is the leader. > > > > Otis > > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > > http://sematext.com/ > > On Apr 29, 2013 5:31 PM, "Furkan KAMACI" <furkankam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think about such situation: > > > > > > Let's assume that I am indexing at my SolrCloud. My leader has a > version > > of > > > higher than replica as well (I have one leader and one replica for each > > > shard). If I kill leader, replica will be leader as well. When I > startup > > > old leader again it will be a replica for my shard. > > > > > > However I think that leader will have less document than replica and a > > less > > > version than replica. Does it cause a problem because of leader is > behing > > > of replica? > > > > > >
