Jack, Why are multi-valued fields considered messy? I think I am about to learn something..
Thanks Another Jack On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com> wrote: > Try the simplest, cleanest design first (at least on paper), before you > start resorting to either dynamic fields or multi-valued fields or other > messy approaches. Like, one collection for stories, which would have a story > id and a second collection for comments, each with a comment id and a field > that is the associated story id and user id. And a third collection for > users and their profiles. Identify the user and get their user id. Identify > the story (maybe by keyword search) to get story id. Then identify and facet > user comments by story id and user id and whatever other search criteria, > and then facet on that. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -----Original Message----- From: samabhiK > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 5:24 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Best way to design a "story and comments" schema. > > > Hi, I wish to know how to best design a schema to store comments in stories > / > articles posted. > I have a set of fields: > / <field name="subject" type="text_general" > indexed="true" stored="true"/> > <field name="keywords" type="text_general" > indexed="true" stored="true"/> > <field name="category" type="text_general" > indexed="true" stored="true"/> > <field name="content" type="text_general" > indexed="false" stored="true" /> / > Users can post their comments on a post and I should be able to retrieve > these comments and show it along side the original post. I only need to show > the last 3 comments and show a facet of the remaining comments which user > can click and see the rest of the comments ( something like facebook does ). > One alternative, I could think of, was adding a dynamic field for all > comments : > /<dynamicField name="comment_*" type="string" > indexed="false" stored="true"/>/ > So, to store each comments, I would send a text to solr of the form -> > For Field Name: /comment_n/ Value:/[Commenter Name]:[Commenter ID]:[Actual > Comment Text]/ > And to keep the count of those comments, I could use another field like so > :/<field name="comment_count" type="int" > indexed="true" stored="true"/>/ > With this approach, I will have to do some calculation when a comment is > deleted by the user but I still can manage to show the comments right. > My idea is to find the best solution for this scenario which will be fast > and also be simple. > Kindly suggest. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Best-way-to-design-a-story-and-comments-schema-tp4062867.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.