Yes, definitely, fq parameters don't affect scoring and can be cached. Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer o: +1 646 532 3062 | c: +1 917 477 7906 appinions inc. “The Science of Influence Marketing” 18 East 41st Street New York, NY 10017 t: @appinions <https://twitter.com/Appinions> | g+: plus.google.com/appinions w: appinions.com <http://www.appinions.com/> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Learner <bbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently using the below configuration in one of my handler and I was > thinking of removing the values from q parameter and including as a part of > fq parameter. > > Can someone let me know if there is any performance improvement when using > fq parameter compared to q? > > <str name="q"> > ( > _query_:"{!dismax qf=person_name_lname_i v=$fps_lname}"^8.3 OR > ) > > </str> > </lst> > <lst name="appends"> > <str name="fq">{!switch case='*:*' default=$fq_bbox > v=$fps_latlong}</str> > </lst> > <lst name="invariants"> > <str name="fq_bbox">_query_:"{!bbox pt=$fps_latlong sfield=geo > d=$fps_dist}"^0.2</str> > </lst> > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/fq-vs-q-parameter-tp4071748.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
