Thanks Shawn.
Here is the text_general type definition. We would like to bring down the
storage requirement down to a minimum for those 500KB content documents. We
just need basic full-text search.
Thanks!!! :)
<fieldType name="text_general" class="solr.TextField"
positionIncrementGap="100">
<analyzer type="index">
<tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true"
words="stopwords.txt"
enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
<!-- in this example, we will only use synonyms at query
time
<filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory"
synonyms="index_synonyms.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="false"/>
-->
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
</analyzer>
<analyzer type="query">
<tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true"
words="stopwords.txt"
enablePositionIncrements="true"/>
<filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory"
synonyms="synonyms.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
</analyzer>
</fieldType>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 7/2/2013 12:22 PM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
> > Newbie question:
> >
> > We have the following fields defined in the schema:
> >
> > <field name="content" type="text_general" indexed="true" stored="false"/>
> > <field name="teaser" type="text_general" indexed="false" stored="true"/>
> > <copyField source="content" dest="teaser" maxChars="80"/>
> >
> > the content is field is about 500KB data.
> >
> > My question is whether Solr stores the entire contents of the that 500KB
> > content field?
> >
> > We want to minimize the stored data in the Solr index, that is why we
> added
> > the copyField teaser.
>
> With that config, the entire 500KB will not be _stored_ .. but it will
> affect the index size because you are indexing it. Exactly what degree
> that will be depends on the definition of the text_general type.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
