Thanks!
On 23 July 2013 12:19, Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io> wrote: > Eeh, here's the other one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1712 > > > -----Original message----- >> From:Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io> >> Sent: Tuesday 23rd July 2013 13:18 >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: facet.maxcount ? >> >> Hi - No but there are two unresolved issues about this topic: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4411 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4411 >> >> Cheers >> >> -----Original message----- >> > From:Jérôme Étévé <jerome.et...@gmail.com> >> > Sent: Tuesday 23rd July 2013 12:58 >> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: facet.maxcount ? >> > >> > Hi all happy Solr users! >> > >> > I was wondering if it's possible to have some sort of facet.maxcount >> > equivalent? >> > >> > In short, that would exclude from the facet any term (or query) that >> > matches at least facet.maxcount times. >> > >> > That facet.maxcount would probably significantly improve the >> > performance of request of the type: >> > >> > I want the facet values with zero result. >> > >> > Is it a mad idea or does it make some sort of sense? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Jerome. >> > >> > -- >> > Jerome Eteve >> > +44(0)7738864546 >> > http://www.eteve.net/ >> > >> -- Jerome Eteve +44(0)7738864546 http://www.eteve.net/
