So, it sounds like that either Solr is treated as a webapp, in which case
it is installed with most of the webapps under Tomcat (legacy/operational
reason). So, Solr docs just needs to explain how to deploy under Tomcat and
the rest of document/tooling comes from Tomcat community.

Or, if Solr is treated not as a webapp but as a black box, it needs to
support and explain all the operational requirements (deployment,
extension, monitoring) that are currently waved away as a 'container
issue'.

Regards,
   Alex.
P.s. I also agree that example directory layout is become very confusing
and may need to be re-thought. Probably a discussion for a different
thread, if somebody has a thought out suggestion.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working.  (Anonymous  - via GTD book)


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Gopal Patwa <gopalpa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> My case is also similar to "Sujit Pal" but we have jboss6.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Sujit Pal <sujit....@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > In our case, it is because all our other applications are deployed on
> > Tomcat and ops is familiar with the deployment process. We also had
> > customizations that needed to go in, so we inserted our custom JAR into
> the
> > solr.war's WEB-INF/lib directory, so to ops the process of deploying Solr
> > was (almost, except for schema.xml or solrconfig.xml changes) identical
> to
> > any of the other apps. But I think if Solr becomes a server with clearly
> > defined extension points (such as dropping your custom JARs into lib/ and
> > custom configuration in conf/solrconfig.xml or similar like it already
> is)
> > then it will be treated as something other than a webapp and the
> > expectation that it runs on Tomcat will not apply.
> >
> > Just my $0.02...
> >
> > Sujit
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Siegfried Goeschl <sgoes...@gmx.at>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi ALex,
> > >
> > > in my case
> > >
> > > * ignorance that Tomcat is not fully supported
> > > * Tomcat configuration and operations know-how inhouse
> > > * could migrate to Jetty but need approved change request to do so
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Siegfried Goeschl
> > >
> > > On 12.11.13 04:54, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> I keep seeing here and on Stack Overflow people trying to deploy Solr
> to
> > >> Tomcat. We don't usually ask why, just help when where we can.
> > >>
> > >> But the question happens often enough that I am curious. What is the
> > >> actual
> > >> business case. Is that because Tomcat is well known? Is it because
> other
> > >> apps are running under Tomcat and it is ops' requirement? Is it
> because
> > >> Tomcat gives something - to Solr - that Jetty does not?
> > >>
> > >> It might be useful to know. Especially, since Solr team is considering
> > >> making the server part into a black box component. What use cases will
> > >> that
> > >> break?
> > >>
> > >> So, if somebody runs Solr under Tomcat (or needed to and gave up),
> let's
> > >> use this thread to collect this knowledge.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>     Alex.
> > >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
> > >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> > >> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all
> at
> > >> once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working.  (Anonymous  - via GTD
> > book)
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to