Thanks Ahmet for the correction. I used wireshark to capture an
UpdateRequest to solr and saw this XML:
<add><doc boost="1.0"><field name="caseID">123</field><field
name="caseName">blah</field></doc></add>
and figured that javabin was only for the responses. Does wt apply for how
solrj send requests to solr? Could this HTTP content be in javabin format?
Toby
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Toby,
>
> SolrJ uses javabin by default.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 11:31 PM, Toby Lazar <tla...@capitaltg.com>
> wrote:
> I believe SolrJ uses XML under the covers. If so, I don't think you would
> improve performance by switching to SolrJ, since the client would convert
> it to XML before sending it on the wire.
>
> Toby
>
> *******************************
> Toby Lazar
> Capital Technology Group
> Email: tla...@capitaltg.com
> Mobile: 646-469-5865
> *******************************
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > One thing to consider is, I think solrnet use xml update, there is xml
> > parsing overhead with it.
> > Switching to solrJ or CSV can cause additional gain.
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed
> >
> > Ahmet
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 10:13 PM, sweety <sweetyshind...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > I will surely read about JVM Garbage collection. Thanks a lot, all of
> you.
> >
> > But, is the time required for my indexing good enough? I dont know about
> > the
> > ideal timings.
> > I think that my indexing is taking more time.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/to-reduce-indexing-time-tp4121391p4121483.html
> >
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
