not a problem furkan :)

With Regards
Aman Tandon


On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Ooops, just a typo Aman :)
> 13 Nis 2014 05:52 tarihinde "Aman Tandon" <amantandon...@gmail.com> yazdı:
>
> > Thanks Furkan...its aman not amon hahah...:D
> >
> >
> > With Regards
> > Aman Tandon
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Amon;
> > >
> > > There has been a conversation about it at dev list:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://search-lucene.com/m/PrTmPXyDlv/The+Old+Git+Discussion&subj=Re+The+Old+Git+Discussion
> > > On
> > > the other hand you do not need to know SVN to use, develop and
> contribute
> > > to Apache Solr project. You can follow the project at GitHub:
> > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr
> > >
> > > Thanks;
> > > Furkan KAMACI
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-04-11 5:12 GMT+03:00 Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > thanks sir,
> > > > in that case i need to know about svn as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Aman Tandon
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> > > > <arafa...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You can find the read-only Git's version of Lucene+Solr source code
> > > > > here: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr . The SVN preference
> is
> > > > > Apache Foundation's choice and legacy. Most of the developers'
> > > > > workflows are also around SVN.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >    Alex.
> > > > >
> > > > > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
> > > > > Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your
> Solr
> > > > > proficiency
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Aman Tandon <
> > amantandon...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am new here, i have question in mind that why we are preferring
> > the
> > > > svn
> > > > > > more than git?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > With Regards
> > > > > > Aman Tandon
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to