what firmware r u using? pre-6.3.x.x doesnt support nat traversal what client r u using? pre-8.x doesnt support nat traversal
i believe that gateways/routers like the linksys use ipsec passthrough that oviate the need for nat traversal Kok-Yong Tan wrote: >I found this in my SonicWall TELE2's logs when I tried unsuccessfully to connect a >VPN through a NAT-enabled remote ISP: > >10/02/2002 00:58:20.768 - NAT Discovery : Peer IPSec Security Gateway doesn't >support VPN NAT Traversal > >Does it mean: > >1. That IPSec doesn't handle VPNs that go through NAT-based networks (something I >heard at the O'Reilly MacOS X Conference presentation by Paul Hoffman of the VPN >Consortium--something about IPSec, as currently defined, doesn't handle VPNs with >endpoints that terminate in non-routable IPs). > >Or > >2. That SonicWall has detected a NAT-based network at the other end which doesn't >support VPN NAT Traversal/Passthrough (which the same Paul Hoffman stated some >companies have implemented as an enhancement/workaround to the IPSec standards but >which isn't part of the standards.) And that it's implying that SonicWall has >implemented this? > >Inquiring minds want to know. (And, yes, I've already sent in a query to SonicWall. >Wish me luck at getting an intelligible, helpful response from them.) > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/F-Prot AV] =================================================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the email put the following: unsubscribe sonicwall your_name The archive of this list is at http://www.mail-archive.com/sonicwall%40peake.com/
