Parliamentary Assembly
Assemblée parlementaire 
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution 1417 (2005)[1]

Protection of human rights in Kosovo


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Kosovo is part of the territory of Serbia and Montenegro which has, since 
April 2003, been a member of the Council of Europe and, since 3 March 2004, 
party to the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 5). As a result of 
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999), however, Kosovo is 
administered by the international community, led by the UN Interim 
Administration Mission in Kosovo (Unmik), and its security is guaranteed by the 
Nato-led Kosovo Stabilization Force (Kfor). Security Council Resolution 1244 
requires Unmik to protect and promote human rights in Kosovo as one of its main 
responsibilities, and Kosovo’s exclusion from Serbia and Montenegro’s 
jurisdiction precludes Serbia and Montenegro’s obligations under international 
conventions from applying effectively to Kosovo.

2. Whilst Unmik and Kfor have achieved some positive results in relation to the 
extremely difficult tasks with which they were charged in 1999 – in particular, 
routine security duties are now predominantly discharged by civilian police 
forces, the Unmik police (Civpol) and, increasingly, the Kosovo Police Service 
(“KPS”) and much of Kosovo’s administration is now undertaken by the local 
Provisional Institutions of Self-Government (PISG) – serious concerns remain as 
regards the protection of human rights in Kosovo, especially after the tragic 
events of 17 to 19 March 2004. Kosovo is a part of Europe, and the fact that it 
is currently under interim administration should not deprive its inhabitants of 
the effective protection of European human rights standards. 

3. In the Parliamentary Assembly’s view, many of the substantive human rights 
problems faced by Kosovo, including matters relating to the issue of internally 
displaced persons, could be alleviated by enhancing and supplementing human 
rights protection mechanisms, within the context of the interim administration 
and without prejudice to the issue of Kosovo’s final status.

4. The Assembly therefore recommends that Unmik and Kfor/Nato, in accordance 
with United Nations Security Council Resolution No. 1244:

i. commence work, in co-operation with the Council of Europe, towards 
establishing a human rights court for Kosovo, with the following 
characteristics:

a. establishment by parallel agreements to be concluded between the Council of 
Europe on the one hand, and Unmik and Kfor/Nato (along with individual 
Kfor-participating states as appropriate) on the other;

b. jurisdiction to examine complaints alleging violations of the rights 
contained in the European Convention on Human Rights and its additional 
protocols by Unmik, Kfor and Kfor national contingents and the Provisional 
Institutions of Self-Government;

c. composition of nine judges, five international and four local, with the 
international judges being nominated by the Committee of Ministers of the 
Council of Europe (one of these being nominated in agreement with the Special 
Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations), and the local 
judges being nominated half by the majority community and half by the minority 
communities. Judges would be appointed by the President of the European Court 
of Human Rights;

d. procedures and case-law based on those of the European Court of Human Rights;

e. competence to receive applications from both individuals and the 
ombudsperson, acting with their consent on their behalf;

f. composition of international judges only when reviewing acts or omissions by 
Unmik or Kfor;

g. power to annul decisions and acts of Unmik and Kfor and to award appropriate 
redress or compensation;

ii. co-operate with the Council of Europe, in association with other interested 
parties, in particular Serbia and Montenegro, on a study of possible interim 
extension of the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights to all the 
inhabitants of Kosovo.

5. The Assembly further recommends that Unmik:

i. establish the special chamber of the supreme court on constitutional 
framework matters, with the following characteristics:

a. competence to receive applications from individuals or from the ombudsperson 
acting with their consent on their behalf;

b. jurisdiction to review all Provisional Assembly laws other than those 
amended in promulgation by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General 
of the United Nations so as to bring them into conformity with international 
human rights standards, which would fall within the jurisdiction of the human 
rights court for Kosovo;

c. composition of five judges, three local (two from the majority community and 
one from the minority communities) and two international, the latter being 
proposed by the President of the European Court of Human Rights, and all being 
appointed by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United 
Nations;

ii. improve the state of legal certainty, including by:

a. ensuring that Unmik regulations state clearly which, if any, previous 
instruments they revoke or amend, and if amended, how so;

b. ensuring that all legal instruments are published and disseminated to all 
concerned parties promptly and effectively, including by efficient use of 
information technology, with simultaneous high-quality translation into all 
official languages;

c. allowing for an appropriate vacatio legis following the promulgation of all 
legal instruments;

d. accompanying the future promulgation of new legal instruments by appropriate 
training of all public officials concerned, in particular those working within 
the judicial system and law-enforcement agencies, to prepare them for the entry 
into force of such instruments;

iii. reinforce the judicial system, including by:

a. taking further steps to construct and maintain, both at general and local 
level, a judiciary reflecting the ethnic composition of Kosovo as a whole;

b. ensuring that there are sufficient judges for the caseload of the courts and 
that judges are allocated to courts in such a way as to achieve balance in 
individual caseloads;

c. continuing to ensure that any actual or apparent ethnic bias, submission to 
outside influence or corruption on the part of judges are countered, including 
through effective disciplinary measures, where appropriate;

d. improving judicial salaries, so as to attract more of the most 
highly-qualified candidates and to avoid any temptation to accept bribes;

e. providing full and effective training to judges, prosecutors and lawyers on 
all aspects of the law, in particular new instruments such as the Provisional 
Criminal Code and Provisional Criminal Procedure Code and international human 
rights instruments applicable in Kosovo;

f. ensuring that all international judges have a proper command of at least one 
of the official languages, along with sufficient experience of a relevant legal 
system and of the applicable international human rights instruments;

iv. maintain and strengthen the authority of the ombudsperson institution in 
Kosovo, including by:

a. requiring the Special Representative of the Secretary General of the United 
Nations and the PISG to give final responses to its recommendations within a 
reasonable time, with any refusal to accept such recommendations being properly 
justified;

b. respecting fully its obligations under Unmik Regulation No. 2000/38 to 
co-operate with and provide access to documents to the ombudsperson;

c. deciding that the “international” status of the institution shall be 
maintained for as long as the international administration remains in Kosovo;

v. create an advisory panel/human rights commission consisting of independent 
international human rights experts nominated by the President of the European 
Court of Human Rights and appointed by the Special Representative of the 
Secretary General of the United Nations, charged with scrutinising (draft) 
Unmik regulations and subsidiary instruments for compliance with international 
human rights standards, along with other tasks such as hearing appeals from the 
Unmik Claims Office, and addressing to Unmik opinions on issues, other than 
individual complaints, brought to its attention by the ombudsperson;

vi. improve the effectiveness of the Housing and Property Directorate (HPD) and 
the Housing and Property Claims Commission (HPCC), and of civil courts when 
dealing with property disputes, including by:

a. ensuring that proceedings before the HPCC comply with the standards of 
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, with possible further 
appeal to the human rights court for Kosovo, when established;

b. allocating sufficient resources to the HPD/HPCC;

c. ensuring that appropriate support is provided by the civilian police forces 
and through improved co-ordination between the HPD/HPCC and the courts;

d. guaranteeing that all internally displaced persons will have their claims 
properly considered by an appropriate mechanism, whether the HPD/HPCC or the 
civil courts;

e. reinforcing measures against illegal constructions, in particular those on 
illegally-occupied land, by ensuring that courts and the police take 
appropriate action;

vii. improve procedures for expropriation of property, including by:

a. ensuring that the procedures set out in the 1986 Law on Expropriation and 
other applicable instruments are strictly followed, with compensation 
respecting real property values;

b. enhancing the independence of the Unmik Claims Office, by including a 
majority of independent members on the claims panel;

c. strengthening the standing of applicants and/or their legal representatives 
and providing for an effective right of appeal from the claims panel to an 
independent tribunal (this could be the advisory panel, with further appeal to 
the human rights court for Kosovo, as each is established);

viii. improve the status and effectiveness of the civilian police forces Civpol 
and the KPS, including by:

a. encouraging recruitment to the KPS from the minority communities and 
ensuring that all officers are posted in a way that inspires local communities’ 
confidence in the KPS as a multi-ethnic force;

b. taking firm and effective action against any officers suspected of 
misconduct, especially any exhibition of ethnic bias;

c. transferring police stations to the control of the KPS as soon as 
circumstances allow;

d. ensuring that all police officers are fully trained in the new provisional 
criminal codes, notably with respect to detention provisions, in relevant 
international human rights standards, and in the strict implementation of those 
codes and standards in practice;

e. promoting effective co-operation and co-ordination between the police forces 
and Kfor;

f. providing the police forces, in particular the KPS, with sufficient 
resources to discharge their duties effectively;

ix. review the state of immunities, in particular by:

a. revising Regulation No. 2000/47 so as to ensure that the immunities of Unmik 
and Kfor do not hinder the effective implementation of these recommendations;

b. ensuring that all international officials, including police officers, are 
always subject to an effective criminal and civil jurisdiction, either local or 
in the country of origin.

6. The Assembly also recommends that Kfor, Nato and Kfor-participating states 
(as appropriate):

i. adhere strictly to the commitment to detain only where absolutely necessary 
and transfer immediately all detained persons to the custody of civilian police 
forces;

ii. revise and enhance the Kfor Detention Directive and Detention Review Panel, 
including by:

a. removing the qualification “every effort will be made” from the requirement 
to comply with all relevant international human rights standards and ensuring, 
in particular, compliance with the standards of Article 5 of the European 
Convention on Human Rights;

b. reinforcing the authority and independence of the Detention Review Panel by 
involving it in all detention decisions of the Commander Kfor, ensuring that it 
is composed exclusively of independent lawyers, nominated by the President of 
the European Court of Human Rights, and making its decisions on detention 
binding, pending the establishment of a jurisdiction in these matters for the 
human rights court for Kosovo;

c. ensuring that all persons arrested or detained are provided with legal 
representation on conditions equivalent to the relevant provisions of Unmik 
Regulation No. 2003/26 on the Provisional Criminal Procedure Code;

d. furnishing detainees with copies of the advisory panel’s decisions and, with 
the informed consent of the detainee, by publicising such decisions;

e. ensuring provision of compensation for unlawful arrest or detention, 
equivalent to that provided for in the Provisional Criminal Procedure Code;

f. extending the competence of the advisory panel to include examination of 
allegations of other human rights violations committed by Kfor, in which cases 
it should also be able to recommend appropriate redress or compensation. 
Alternatively, should it be considered more appropriate, an agreement should be 
reached with the ombudsperson to extend the institution’s jurisdiction to cover 
such allegations;

g. all Kfor-participating states accepting the jurisdiction of the Detention 
Review Panel;

iii. improve procedures for adjudicating on claims relating to expropriation of 
property, including by:

a. providing a more effective right of appeal by including a majority of 
independent members on the Kfor Claims Appeal Commission and permitting further 
appeal to the human rights court for Kosovo, when established;

b. all Kfor-participating states accepting the jurisdiction of the Kfor system, 
including its Appeal Commission;

iv. promote effective co-operation and co-ordination with the civilian police 
forces and avoid any possibility of obstructing these forces’ investigations;

v. make the necessary arrangements with the Council of Europe for 
implementation of the mechanism of the European Convention for the Prevention 
of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (ETS No. 126) at 
the earliest opportunity.

7. Finally, the Assembly recommends that the PISG:

i. contribute to improving the state of legal certainty by ensuring appropriate 
training of all public officials, especially those working within the judicial 
system, on the applicable law in force, and in particular on new legal 
instruments and applicable international human rights instruments, notably the 
European Convention on Human Rights and its additional protocols;

ii. ensure full and effective respect for human rights in policy and 
legislative development, including by:

a. establishing an inter-departmental task-force within the Provisional 
Government with responsibility for co-ordinating and mainstreaming human rights 
matters, including inter-ethnic relations, good governance and equality, and 
possibly also community issues and returns;

b. creating a human rights committee within the Provisional Assembly in order 
to scrutinise draft laws and the acts of the Provisional Government;

iii. ensure that the procedures set out in the 1986 Law on Expropriation and 
other relevant instruments are strictly followed, with compensation reflecting 
real property values;

iv. contribute to reinforcing the ombudsperson institution in Kosovo by always 
co-operating fully with the ombudsperson in accordance with their legal 
obligations, in particular by complying with the ombudsperson’s requests for 
relevant information and documentation;

v. co-operate fully in the implementation of the existing and future agreements 
between Unmik and the Council of Europe on the application of the latter’s 
human rights protection mechanisms.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1]. Assembly debate on 25 January 2005 (3rd Sitting) (see Doc. 10393, report 
of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, rapporteur: Mr Lloyd).
Text adopted by the Assembly on 25 January 2005 (3rd Sitting).

Lycos email has 300 Megabytes of free storage... Get it now at mail.lycos.co.uk

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



===============
Group Moderator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
page at http://magazine.sorabia.net
for more informations about current situation in Serbia http://www.sorabia.net 
Slusajte GLAS SORABIJE nas talk internet-radio (Serbian Only)
http://radio.sorabia.net
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sorabia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Одговори путем е-поште